Marketing Mix Of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings

Posted by Zander Henry on Aug-22-2018

1. marketing mix

1.1. Understanding the marketing mix

  • The marketing mix is an important set of marketing tools and characteristics that a firm uses to increase penetration in the target market groups
  • Using the marketing mix strategically includes focusing on seven important aspects of marketing and branding for an organization, namely: product, place, price, promotion, people, process, and physical evidence

1.2. Importance of marketing mix

  • The marketing mix helps a company choose and decide on a suitable marketing strategy
  • The marketing mix also helps a company in resource and budget allocation to different aspects of the marketing strategy and product development
  • The marketing mix also allows a company to choose the right and effective marketing tactics for its promotional needs

2. Marketing mix for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings

Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings makes use of the marketing mix strategically to achieve not only the marketing objectives but also the broader organizational objectives.

Marketing Mix Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is presented below:

2.1. Product

Product is one of the most important components of the Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings Marketing mix. The distinctive characteristics of the product by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings are:

2.1.1. Quality

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings maintains the high quality of products
  • High product quality is maintained by adding value during different stages of the value chain
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings procures raw materials from reliable and trusted suppliers only
  • These raw materials are processed under carefully maintained environments to maintain high and consistent quality of the products
  • High quality promise and delivery also provides Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings with a distinctive competitive advantage

2.1.2. Ease of use

  • The products manufactured and sold by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings are relatively easy to use
  • All products come with a user manual, which is easy to understand and which provides simple instructions for product use
  • The consumers can also call the 24/7 helpline to understand details about product usage
  • Also, retail representatives provide detailed instructions and explanations regarding the use of the product at the time of the sale

2.1.3. Portfolio broadness

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has a broad portfolio of products
  • The broad portfolio helps Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings in reaching different target groups in the market
  • Also, the broad portfolio allows financial strength to Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings
  • The broader product portfolio also adds more value for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings

2.1.4. Benefits of product consumption

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings offers functional benefits to consumers of the product use
  • These functional benefits are promised and delivered – however, they are also delivered by other similar products
  • The distinguishing aspect of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is its delivery of emotional benefits to the consumer
  • Products manufactured and sold by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings promise consumers an ego boost, confidence, and security
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also promises fulfilment of psychological needs on product consumption
  • These psychological needs include, for example, the need for empathy, the need for belonging, and the need of feeling loved.

2.1.5. Different SKUs

  • The products by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings are available in different sizes
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has made use of different SKUs to increase market penetration
  • Different SKUs can be brought and used as per the consumption needs of the consumers, and the target markets
  • Through the production of different SKUs, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has also increased the trial rate
  • Different SKUs have also helped Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings improve its product accessibility

2.2. Price

Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings marketing mix focuses on a hybrid strategy for pricing to obtain maximum value for its products. The marketing mix Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings uses a combination of a number of techniques for pricing its products, which are detailed below:

2.2.1. Premium pricing

  • By using premium pricing for some of its product ranges, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings encourages favorable brand and product perceptions in target consumer groups
  • Premium pricing for products also encourages a favorable quality perception of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings products amongst consumers
  • With premium prices, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has successfully also made some of its product ranges exclusive by restricting sales and production. This, in turn, leads to a perception g luxury in consumption products
  • Premium prices add a touch of privilege and high value in Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings products
  • Using elements of premium prices in other product ranges has also allowed Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to maintain significantly high profits and a consistent business growth

2.2.2. Psychological pricing

  • Since Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has a number of different product ranges and product groups, the use of psychological pricing has been beneficial
  • With the use of psychological pricing, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also successfully adds more value to its products from the point of view of customers
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also gains higher sales with psychological pricing
  • Consumer purchase a higher amount of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings products because of its use of psychological pricing
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is able to increase its target audience and broaden its target purchaser groups

2.2.3. Geographical pricing

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is able to penetrate different regional markets optimally with the use of geographical pricing
  • For offshore locations, geographical pricing also allows Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to cover shipping and customs expenses
  • Geographical pricing also allows Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to maintain consistent revenue growth by altering pricing in different markets based on local currency value

2.2.4. Bundle pricing

  • For some product ranges, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is also known to use bundle pricing strategy popularly
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also uses bundle pricing during sales
  • Bundle pricing increases the trial rate for consumers
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings experiences higher return on the cost of gaining a new customer
  • With bundle pricing, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is also able to control costs and prices by lowering marketing and distribution expenses
  • The use of bundle pricing also adds value to the umbrella brand name of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings.

2.3. Placement

Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings places high importance on the placement of its products because it directly relates to accessibility for consumers.

2.3.1. Company-operated stored

  • The company maintains stores operated by the management of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings in all markets
  • Company-operated stores give Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings higher control over operations as well as store layout and design
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also interacts directly with the consumers and gathers important details regarding consumer behavior and consumer feedback through company-operated stores
  • The company operated stores also give leverage to Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings in terms of decisions regarding the stocking of different product items

2.3.2. Licensed stores

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings licensed stores also allow consumers to enjoy the various product offerings by the company
  • Licensed stores also decrease the risk of financial and physical investment for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings in unstable markets
  • Licensed stores have also given Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings high business growth, and a boost for rapid market expansion and penetration
  • Through licensed stores, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has also learned about local consumers and cultures
  • Licensed stores and shops encourage sales of products by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings by aligning it with local cultural values
  • Licensed stores also help Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings in localizing its product offerings to enhance brand equity and band image

2.3.3. E-commerce

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has developed a successfully operational website for online order placement and order tracking
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also encourages sales through social media portals, where the company takes orders through direct messages, as well as through a mini-shop model
  • The company also stocks products with online retailers such as Amazon and eBay, as well as smaller local online retailers as well
  • Online retailing, and using the internet to make sales has boosted the sales for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings and has also increased the accessibility of its products for consumers.

2.3.4. Supermarkets and hypermarkets

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also places its products in supermarkets and hypermarkets across the country
  • A large number of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings target groups shop from supermarkets and hypermarkets
  • Placement in supermarkets and hypermarkets also improve cost efficiency for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings

2.3.5. Partner agents

  • In offshore locations, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also makes use of partner agents for its products’ placement
  • These partner agents are assessed and evaluated on strategic compatibility and reliance
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings contracts with partner agents in other countries and markets for its product placement to ensure quality control and terms of negotiation

2.4. Promotion

The marketing strategy for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also places high importance on the promotional tactics and strategies used. The promotional strategies allow the Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to interact with the consumers and influence them directly. Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings uses a 360-degree approach in its promotional activities, and makes use of the following means of promotion:

2.4.1. Digital marketing

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has corporate profiles on all social media websites and portals
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings uses its social media presence to directly, engage with consumers
  • This direct engagement and interaction allows Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to understand the customers, their needs and demands
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings uses this feedback and incorporates it in its broader marketing and organizational strategy
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also maintains a corporate website – which highlights company information, product information as well as information regarding any ongoing campaigns and sales

2.4.2. Reward Programs

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has a loyalty card program for its customers
  • The loyalty card allows customers to redeem points in exchange for products or other exciting gifts, as directed by the company
  • Each purchase is entered into the loyalty card by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings and is valued for points against the products’ monetary value
  • The loyalty card can be purchased or is given complementary by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings on high valued purchases
  • Frequent usage and purchase of products by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also has rewards against the loyalty card

2.4.3. Community Influencers

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings makes use of community influencers as its on-ground promotional efforts
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings identifies strong and confident individuals to be brand ambassadors in their communities
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings provides these brand ambassadors and community influencers with its product range and invites them to use it themselves to see benefits

2.4.4. Conventional marketing

  • The company places advertisements in consumer-related magazines. This largely includes home decor, and home management magazines
  • Magazine ads are not very frequent, but appear twice every quarter of the fiscal year
  • In high-density locations, Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also makes use of out of house hoardings
  • Hoardings increase visibility for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings and also work towards building stronger brand recall
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also produces TV advertisements
  • All TV advertisements have an emotional appeal to them
  • TV advertisements by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings have progressed to include a slice of life elements and characteristics
  • TV advertisements by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also highlight the functional benefits of the product

2.5. People

The marketing mix of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also places an essential focus on people development and people building. This is because Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings realizes the importance of employees in building strong customer relationships. Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings develops its employee and people by focusing on the following aspects:

2.5.1. Training

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings makes sure that all employees undergo regular training sessions for skill development and enhancement
  • Trainings at Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings are not the only field related, but also focus on essential management and organizational skills
  • Training sessions and activities at Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also identify with the employee's own needs of progression, development and growth
  • All training sessions and activities designed and carried out by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings take into consideration business goals and objectives, as well as employee's personal goals and aspirations
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings, therefore, tries to develop the employee as an organizational member, as well as an individual
  • All training is engaging, and hands-on so that employees do not only learn but also experience

2.5.2. Organizational ownership

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings works on strengthening the organizational commitment in its employees
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings builds employee loyalty so that people can reflect their optimal best at work
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also understands that satisfied employees will lead to happy and satisfied customers
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings regularly shares different reward programs for employees, including stock sharing, so that their organizational commitment and ownership is enhanced
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also includes employees in decision making at different managerial levels, and regularly takes their feedback for different projects and products – which also work towards building organizational ownership

2.5.3. Motivation building

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings employees are the face of the organization
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings are motivated through the exciting and creative organizational culture
  • Employees are also motivated through different reward programs and bonuses that Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings distributes
  • Another source of motivation is appreciation programs where management appreciates and acknowledges the work and performance of different employees

2.5.4. Succession planning

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings remains one of the leading players in the industry also because of its focus on succession planning
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings conducts succession planning for all managerial levels
  • Succession planning is done through internal promotions as well as external recruitments to meet the needs and demands of the vacant job position at Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings
  • Strategic succession planning has allowed Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to be prepared for different challenges, and also be resourceful enough to deflect them

2.6. Process

Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has organized and systematic processes in place to make sure that the business experiences consistent growth.

2.6.1. Operations

  • All operations at Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings are clearly defined and communicated to the employees
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings makes sure that employees are well trained, and knowledgeable of all processes relates to operations
  • All stages of operational processes focus on maintaining a high quality level and standard of the products
  • Systematic process re in place for all operation – from procurement to the final sale of the products
  • All operational processes are maintained, checked, and uploaded through the internal portal of the organization for supervisory purposes
  • The use of online portals for operational processes also builds a strong backup for managerial purposes at Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings

2.6.2. People Management

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has also defined clear processes for people management through streamlining its human resource management department
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has defined guidelines regarding recruitment, training, compensation management, and performance appraisal of employees
  • All people related processes are not only communicated to the management and supervisors, but also to employees to create a sense of transparency, and an environment of trust
  • Progressive people management systems and processes have allowed Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to keep its workforce motivated and happy – which reflects in satisfied customers

2.6.3. Quality maintenance

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also has defined policies and processes for managing and maintaining quality
  • All products undergo triple quality checks to ensure that customers receive the best product
  • In addition to quality checks at the production and distribution level, the management has also placed separate quality maintenance and quality check department
  • The quality maintenance department has experts who make sure that not only the final product but also the processes involved in producing the product were infused with quality

2.6.4. Store management

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings manages store management through stringent and closely monitored policies and processes
  • These processes relate to not only the floor and space design but also to the performance of the employees at the store
  • The processes for store management also regularly monitor footfall and work on strategies to increase footfall through different tactics, and changes in the store design and store management
  • The company also has a systematic process for customers who interact with the products and feel them before making the purchase
  • The final sale at the store is also clearly defined – for the employees and the customers both
  • Processes and policies are important for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings for maintaining quality of the products, and for ensuring that the company does not experience any unnecessary expenses and costs

2.7. Physical evidence

The physical evidence is also important in the marketing strategy for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings as it works towards influencing the consumers in favor of the brand and its offerings. The physical evidence for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings include:

2.7.1. Store atmosphere

  • The store design and management for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings is exciting and creative
  • The store atmosphere makes the customers feel relaxed and comfortable –so that they can interact with, and enjoy product offerings by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings at ease
  • The store design is also important for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings because it controls the level and nature of experience and interaction that the customers have with the product and the brand
  • With company-operated stores, it is easier for Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings to control and manage the store atmosphere to be able to positively influence customers and to be able to appeal to them emotionally

2.7.2. Packaging

  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has unique packaging, which is different from other players in the industry
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also has a vibrant touché to its packaging, which is regularly changed in terms of colors and patterns
  • The logo for the company is simple, and recognizable by the consumers easily
  • The brand logo has also become a symbol of confidence, ambition, and aspiration for consumers who use products by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings
  • The packaging of the products is sophisticatedly done and matches the brand image developed and maintained by Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings

2.7.3. Website design

  • The website design is simple and easy to use
  • Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings has a customer friendly user interface which allows easy navigation and understanding of its various product offerings
  • The corporate website of Geographical Differences in Poverty and Quality-of-life Ratings also has the brand logo, and is packaged similarly to the products offered by the company
  • The design patterns, and color change on the website with changes to the product packaging to match various campaign needs and sale offerings

3. References

Dahlén, M., Lange, F. & Smith, T., 2010. Marketing communications: A brand narrative approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

De Chernatony, L., 1999. Brand Management through Narrowing the Gap between Brand Identity and Brand Reputation. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1–3), p. 157–79.

Harish, R., 2008. Brand Architecture and its Applications in Strategic Marketing:The Example of L’Oréal. The Icfai Journal of Marketing Management, 7(2), pp. 39-51.

IÅ¡oraitÄ—, M., 2009. Theoretical aspects of marketing strategy. Ekonomika ir vadyba: aktualijos ir perspektyvos: mokslo darbai, Volume 1, pp. 114-125.

Keller, K., 2001. Mastering the marketing communications mix : Micro and macro perspectives on integrated marketing communication programs. Journal of Marketing Management, Volume 17, p. 819–847.

Kotler , P., 2003. Marketing Management. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Kotler, P., 1997. Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Kotler, P., 211. Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), pp. 132-135.

Kotler, P. & Keller, K., 2007. Marketing Management. Praha: Grada Publishing.

Lamb, C., Hair, J. & McDaniel, C., 2011. Essentials of marketing. s.l.:Cengage Learning.

Rafiee, V. & Sarabdeen , J., 2013. Social Media Marketing: The Unavoidable Marketing Management Tool. Dubai, University of Wollongong, pp. 933-942.

Rao, K., 2011. Services Marketing. New Delhi: Pearson Education India.

Richards, K. & Jones, E., 2008. Customer relationship management: Finding value drivers. Industrial marketing management, 37(2), pp. 120-130.

Schmitt, B., 1999. Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, p. 57.

Teilmann, V., 2010. Market Entry Strategies: International Marketing Management. Berlin: GRIN Verlag.

Zahay, D. & Griffin, A., 2010. Marketing strategy selection, marketing metrics, and firm performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(2), pp. 84-93.

9414 Students
can’t be wrong

2084449

Orders

4.9/5

Reviews

1144

PhD Experts

Be a great writer or hire a greater one!

Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.

hire us now
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Interesting Fact

Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!

Allow Our Skilled Essay Writers to Proficiently Finish Your Paper.

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

Maryam
Customer Representative