Marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

Posted by Zander Henry on Aug-22-2018

1. The vision of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

The vision of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is to be the leading quality service and product provider for customers. Being the best and the leading player means that Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy and operations focus on:

• Providing high quality of products and services
• Providing value to customers
• Concentrate on building customer experience

2. The mission of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy is grounded in its mission. The mission for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is to be the favorite brand of the customers. This mission is essential for the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS as it focuses on all operations and marketing activities in the direction of:

• Consumer centrism
• Using research to understand and influence consumers

3. Brand Equity of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

Understanding and knowing the brand equity is vital for directing and giving meaning to the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. The knowledge of brand equity will help in shaping Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy effectively – thereby facilitating the growth of business for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS.

3.1. Brand awareness

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has high brand awareness because of international operations
• The company focuses on higher budget allocation in the country of origin
• Each market for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has modified marketing and strategic directives and plans

3.2. Brand association

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is directly associated with the brand name and product category
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a broad product portfolio
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is associated with promising and delivering quality and innovative products
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is also associated with excellent customer service

3.3. Brand loyalty

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has been successful at gaining high consumer loyalty because of unique and influential marketing strategy
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a global customer base
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS keeps adding value addition to the products and product portfolio to keep consumers engaged

3.4. Brand asset

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a substantial brand value
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also enjoys the high financial worth
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on building a reliable and robust employee base

3.5. Brand element

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS uses the brand element as a means of competitive advantage
• Uses adaptability in product, services, and marketing to meet different cultural demands

4. Situational Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

The situational analysis will help in developing the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS by conducting a thorough market analysis. This market analysis will aid in understanding the compatibility between external opportunities and other factors, and internal strengths – to be used to maximize the marketing influence of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS.

4.1. SWOT

4.1.1. Strengths

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy can benefit from the following internal advantages:

• Strong brand image
• Global distribution network
• Investment in market research
• Innovation

4.1.2. Weakness

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS faces challenges in marketing strategy because of the following weakness:

• Slow organizational processes
• High product prices

4.1.3. Opportunity

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has the following possibilities of business growth:

• Green lifestyles
• Regional expansion
• Diversification

4.1.4. Threats

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS faces business threats because of the following factors:

• Increased competition
• Increased imitation

4.2. PESTEL

4.2.1. Political

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS operates I markets with political stability
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has funding support from the government for small businesses

4.2.2. Economic

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS enjoys high sales because of higher GDP
• Lower interest rates make business expansion and loaning easier for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS
• Low inflation strengthens the financial position of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

4.2.3. Social

• Higher education and awareness increases sales of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS predict
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on understanding consumers and fulfilling their demands through its offerings

4.2.4. Environmental

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has an active CSR program
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS ensures environmental safety in all its operations

4.2.5. Legal

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is aware of local and global laws of business and human resource management
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS abides by all statutes – especially labour law, discrimination law, and employee safety laws

4.3. Porter’s Five Forces

4.3.1. Threat of substitutes

• High risk of replacements
• Substitutes offer similar products at low prices

4.3.2. The threat of new entrants

• New entrants need high financial investment
• New entrants need updated technology for keeping par with industry progress

4.3.3. Bargaining power of buyers

• Sales made to end consumer directly
• Stocking of products at retailers, as well as own-controlled retail outlets

4.3.4. Bargaining power of suppliers

• Multiple suppliers of raw materials
• Suppliers are chosen after careful inspection, and through contracts

4.3.5. Industry rivalry

• High industry rivalry
• Players offer similar products
• Players compete through marketing to influence consumers

5. Marketing Objectives for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS: The Marketing Strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy has the following objectives for the current financial year:

5.1. Increased market penetration

• Increase top of mind recall for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS brand and products by 30%
• Increase sales for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS by 40% by the third quarter of the financial year
• Achieve a trial rate for new products of 10% during the first quarter of the launch
• Increase consumption rate of existing products by 45% during the current financial year

5.2. Enhanced brand recognition

• Increase top of mind recall by 65% during the current fiscal year
• Increase brand recognition by 80% during the first two quarters of the current financial year

5.3. Increased use of digital marketing

• Acquire 25,000 new online customers during the financial year
• Increase website traffic through using blogging and email tactics effectively by 505 during the first two quarters of the year
• Acquire 65,000 likes on the official Facebook page of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS during the first quarter of the financial year

5.4. Retail Growth

• Contract with five more leading supermarkets in the first quarter of the year to stock product at eye level shelving
• Contract with two leading online retail sites – eBay and Amazon – to stock our products, and increase accessibility for consumers globally by the second quarter of the financial year

6. Segmentation of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy uses different means of segmentation to reach an increase in market penetration.

6.1. Demographic segmentation

6.1.1. Age

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has consumers of age groups

• 20-45 years
• 45-60 years

6.1.2. Gender

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a broad product portfolio for both males and females

6.1.3. Life-cycle stage

Consumers for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, according to the marketing strategy, are in the following various life cycle stages:

• Single students
• Single graduates
• Single people living at home/not living at home
• Young couples without children
• Married couples with one to four children – all at home
• Married couples with one or two children in college
• Old married couples with an empty nest

6.1.4. Occupation

The marketing strategy devises the following occupations for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS consumers:

• Professionals
• Students
• House makers

6.2. Psychographic segmentation

6.2.1. Social class

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on segments of middle-upper and upper social classes

6.2.2. Lifestyle

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS consumer segments have the following lifestyle characteristics:

• They aspire towards a better and higher living standard
• They want to be successful – professionally and socially
• They are not hesitant to try new things, products and services in life
• They are confident in their behaviour and attitude
• They are mainstreamers in their fields

6.3. Geographic segmentation

6.3.1. Region

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has operations spread across the western developed countries such as America, the united kingdom, and the Netherlands
• It also has operations in emerging markets such as Brazil, India, and China

6.3.2. Density

• The focus of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS remains on the urban part of the population

6.4. Behavioural segmentation

6.4.1. Personality

The marketing strategy defines personality characteristics for the consumers of the brand of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, such as:

• Determined
• Confident
• Ambitious
• Hardworking

6.4.2. Usage frequency

• The consumer segments for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are regular and frequent users of the product

6.4.3. Benefits sought

• Consumers seek functional benefits
• The focus, however, is more on the emotional benefits reaped from the consumption of the brand

6.4.4. Degree of loyalty

• Consumers are very loyal
• Have an emotional attachment with the brand

7. Targeting of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS Positioning of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

The marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS targets consumer groups based on segmentation as follows:

7.1. Target market

• The target market for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is from middle to upper class
• The target market is ambitious and desires to purchase high-end consumer products
• This target market also seeks affordability
• To meet target market expectations, the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on quality control

7.2. Mass marketing

• The marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on mass marketing
• This also requires unique marketing designs and product promotion programs
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS makes use of one strategy to influence all segments

7.3. Undifferentiated marketing strategy

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS does not differentiate between market segments
• It uses a single marketing strategy to target all segments and consumer groups
• Based on this, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also created the marketing mix under the marketing strategy as a singular one for the whole market – regardless of the segmentation divides.

7.4. Focus on quality

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has created, developed, and maintained a brand that satisfies all consumers under the undifferentiated marketing strategy and mass marketing
• No compromise on quality has been made in the broad product portfolio
• To ensure the influence of a single marketing strategy, the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has also adopted a consumer-centric approach in its overall marketing strategy and operations as well
• This was used for targeting strategy as well as for maintaining growth

8. Company Competitive Advantage in the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

The marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS stands out from the clutter and competition. Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has also achieved a sustainable competitive advantage in its marketing strategy. This is because of the following factors that Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has utilized:

8.1. Cost-effectiveness

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on reaching consumers effectively rather than grandeur
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on developing an integrated marketing approach
• The use of digital marketing efficiently and expertly has helped the company reach a wider audience at a lower cost
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has in-house copywriters for marketing campaigns which also helps in controlling costs
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also focuses efforts on ground activities – which are less expensive than commercial marketing tactics

8.2. Innovation

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has stayed updated with latest developments in marketing research and marketing knowledge
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS makes use of new and innovative tactics to reach its target consumers
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also employs top of the field marketers to facilitate its marketing strategy and promotional campaigns
• Each marketing campaign launched by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is effective catchier and more influential than the previous one

8.3. Strong market research and consumer understanding grounded

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy is strongly grounded in consumer and market research
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS makes informed marketing campaigns and goals based on consumers’ behavioural feedback
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also incorporates consumer feedback in its marketing strategy
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy is based on market trends, and consumer needs and wants

8.4. Making effective use of emotional appeals

• Consumers’ emotional needs strongly influence all marketing objectives and marketing goals set by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS
• In addition to fulfilling functional needs, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also tries to fulfil the emotional and psychological needs of the consumer
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS tries to build a strong emotional bond with the consumer, which also results in high consumer loyalty

9. Distribution Strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy highlights the use of the following distribution strategy to maximize reach and accessibility for consumers.

9.1. Intensive distribution strategy

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS makes use of intensive distribution strategy because it is mass marketing
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS’s marketing strategy is based on undifferentiated segments, and thus an intensive distribution strategy allows high penetration and reaches in the overall market
• With the use of the intensive distribution, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS tries to maximise its coverage of the markets where it's present
• For achieving the intensive strategy, the company uses hardcore 360-degree integrated marketing strategy and campaign to reach all consumers, across all segments in the market.

9.2. Direct distribution strategy

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS uses direct distribution country of origin as well as in locations where it has subsidiary operations
• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also makes use of modern retailing channels
• Also, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS makes use of e-commerce and makes a sale through online retailers, as well as through the company website
• Direct distributions have allowed Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS to increase market penetration and accessibility for consumers

9.3. Indirect distribution strategy

• This strategy is largely used for offshore operations where the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS does not have a subsidiary
• In these offshore locations, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS largely works through the export model
• This makes use of several intermediaries in between, before the product by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS reaches the target consumers
• Intermediaries for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS include not only the end retail outlets, but also sales agents, retail agents, and distribution agents in offshore locations

9.4. Selective distribution strategy

• For some products of its portfolio which are premium in nature, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS makes use of selective distribution channel
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has maintained a few outlets in the country of origin, and in selected offshore markets for these products
• These placements and locations are chosen based on the niche market that Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has for its premium products
• These locations, placements, and marketing strategy helps make the company’s product selectively, but readily accessible for its niche target audience

10. Competition Analysis in the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

The industry in which Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS operates is very responsive to market and consumer trends. Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, therefore, needs to be vigilant in its market strategy towards competition – to make sure that it maintains its competitive advantage.

10.1. Strategic Group Analysis

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS competes with direct and close competition based on quality and price
• Consumers choose between different companies from the industry based on their functional offering
• Consumers have progressively evolved to strengthen loyalty and form an emotional bond with products that they consume
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also competes, thereby, with close competition for building stronger brand image, increasing consume loyalty, and for forming strong emotional ties with the consumer

10.2. Industry rivalry

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS experiences high industry rivalry
• The barriers to entry for the industry are low, and new entrants gain easy access in the industry
• The number of local as well as global players is increasing

11. Marketing mix of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

The marketing mix for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS as per the marketing strategy is the following:

11.1. Product

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a broad product portfolio
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS provides mass marketed products for all segments across the market undifferentiated
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also provides some selected, premium products to niche customer groups
• All products in the portfolio consistently maintain high quality
• All products are tailored to meet consumer specifications, demands and needs across different regional markets
• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS maintains a high focus on innovation in products and introduces new products frequently to keep the consumers engaged

11.2. Place

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS wants to have a close, emotional and personal relationship with its consumers
• The company maintains high control in its distribution strategies – especially through direct distribution strategy
• The company has a presence in leading supermarkets
• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also has company-operated stores in malls, and otherwise to make products accessible to consumers easily
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also makes use of e-commerce to increase penetration and sales

11.3. Price

• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS prices its products so that its target consumers can afford it easily
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS uses relative pricing strategy for its products
• The price of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS’s products include not only the high quality raw materials and value additions but also the enhanced customer experience they deliver
• The company’s pricing strategy allows it to enjoy stable revenue and profit growth

11.4. Promotion

• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a high budget allocated towards marketing activities
• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS invests substantially in digital marketing activities to reap high and effective results
• Use of digital marketing has also allowed Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS marketing strategy to cap costs and expenses
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also takes part in direct consumer engagement through on-ground activities where the company initiates trials
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also invests in traditional media channels to reach maximum consumers in the market

11.5. People

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS has a large workforce across different companies
• This workforce is continually trained to become experts in their respective fields of operations
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS hires without discrimination
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS ensures that its employees remain motivated through building an inspirational and creative organizational culture
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS focuses on also building and maintaining organizational commitment and loyalty in its employees

11.6. Process

• All activities at Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS - from raw material procurement to the final sale to the end consumer - undergo systematic processes
• The processes at Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are well defined, and well communicated to all employees
• All employees are trained to follow the processes internally to ensure consistently high quality as well as timely production and deliveries
• The systematic processes also ensure a smooth running of operations at the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

11.7. Physical evidence

• The physical evidence for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS includes the company logo, company store designs, and the product packaging
• Satisfied and excited customers in the retail spaces of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, as well as during product consumption create a bubbling and an inviting atmosphere
• The e-commerce website for retail by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is also designed with a friendly customer interface to allow maximum interaction with the brand
• The store designs created by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS for its retail space allow consumers maximum interaction with the products directly.

12. Promotional tactics for the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

12.1. Digital marketing

• The company uses social media for reaching consumers effectively
• The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS interacts with the consumers directly, and engages with them, answers their queries and takes their feedback
• The company also shares information and build relationships with consumers through digital marketing
• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS also makes use of blogging, emails, and content creations as a means of digital marketing

12.2. Conventional marketing

• The company uses a 360-degree approach in its marketing strategy
• This means that the company makes use of traditional marketing channels as well – such as TV, magazine adverts, and out of house placements

12.3. Influencers

• For direct, on-ground engagement, the company uses influencers
• Influencers interact with consumers directly, or through their channels of communication as a means of content creation and endorsing the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS brand

13. Monitoring and evaluation of the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS

13.1. Changes in sales

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS regularly tracks its sales to identify the effectiveness of its marketing strategy
• Increase in sales reflect the success of marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS
• Sometimes, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS experiences increase ins ae after some time of the launch of the marketing promotions

13.2. Surveys and focus groups

• Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS frequently conducts focus groups and surveys to identify its brand worth
• These methods also help the company identify brand value, brand recall, and brand recognition
• Focus groups allow Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS to gather feedback on its marketing strategy and helps it understand consumers better

13.3. ROI

• Effectiveness of marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS can also be seen through the revenue and profit growth
• Return on investment allows Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS to effective gauge the effect and influence of the marketing strategy, and measure its success

13.4. Attainment of marketing objectives

• All marketing objectives set by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are SMART
• The quantitative set against each of the marketing objective can facilitate attainment evaluation for the overall marketing strategy
• Successful and timely attainment of these marketing objectives highlight the success of the marketing strategy of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS