VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A

Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018

The VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.

Valuable

• The The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A in combating external threats.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
• The The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis shows that The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A's products.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. These patents also provide The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
• The The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis shows that The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
• The The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.

Rare

• The financial resources of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
• The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. As this resource is valuable, The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A can still make use of this resource.
• The employees of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
• The patents of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are a rare resource as identified by the The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A to use them without interference from the competition.
• The distribution network of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.

Imitable

• The financial resources of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are costly to imitate as identified by the The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
• The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
• The employees of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are also not costly to imitate as identified by the The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
• The patents of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
• The distribution network of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.

Organisation

• The financial resources of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A.
• The Patents of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A are not well organised as identified by the The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
• The distribution network of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A. The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A.

From the VRIO Analysis of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of The Quest for Legitimacy in Digital Disruption The Case of Uber A is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.