- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis shows that TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. These patents also provide TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis shows that TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. As this resource is valuable, TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are a rare resource as identified by the TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are costly to imitate as identified by the TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are also not costly to imitate as identified by the TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD.
- The Patents of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD are not well organised as identified by the TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD. TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD.
From the VRIO Analysis of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Hyden Lucas
5.0
It’s splendid service because it supplied me essay within eight hours. Thanks a lot!
Faqid Ishaan
5.0
I got the solutions of 5 questions in under four hours. The support team is responsible and the expert is intelligent and hardworking.
Angelika Marles
5.0
There should be 10 stars for this service. I really desire to rate it as much as possible. Top standard organization!
Gioia Mike
5.0
The writer was very knowledgeable and quick. Whenever I asked for this service for any paper, it used to help me out. Thanks a lot!
Next Articles
- NOTE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETING PLANS Vrio Analysis
- NATIONAL IR: CATALYST INVESTMENTS ACQUISITION OF MONTREAUX Vrio Analysis
- CANADAHELPS.ORG Vrio Analysis
- WUHAN ERIE POLYMERS JOINT VENTURE Vrio Analysis
- FOUR STAR MOTORSPORTS Vrio Analysis
- CHAMPION PRODUCTS Vrio Analysis
- COMPASSION CANADA Vrio Analysis
- CEMEX: THE SOUTHDOWN OFFER Vrio Analysis
- FASHION HUT Vrio Analysis
- THE COMING REVOLUTION IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- WESTERN INVESTMENT CLUB Vrio Analysis
- GRANDVIEW EXCAVATORS LTD. Vrio Analysis
- DOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONS Vrio Analysis
- STONEY RIDGE VILLA Vrio Analysis
- WESTWOOD SECURITIES (A) Vrio Analysis
- HARRISON LOCKINGTON (A) Vrio Analysis
- CINDY SANDERS Vrio Analysis
- JULIE DEMPSTER (A) Vrio Analysis
- BUILDING THE VELCRO ORGANIZATION: CREATING VALUE THROUGH INTEGRATION&MAINTAINING ORGANIZATION WIDE Vrio Analysis
- RETOOLING R&D: TECHNOLOGY BROKERING AND THE PURSUIT OF INNOVATION Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!