VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND

Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018

The VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.

Valuable

• The TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND in combating external threats.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
• The TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis shows that TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND's products.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. These patents also provide TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
• The TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis shows that TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
• The TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.

Rare

• The financial resources of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
• The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. As this resource is valuable, TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND can still make use of this resource.
• The employees of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
• The patents of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are a rare resource as identified by the TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND to use them without interference from the competition.
• The distribution network of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.

Imitable

• The financial resources of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are costly to imitate as identified by the TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
• The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
• The employees of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are also not costly to imitate as identified by the TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
• The patents of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
• The distribution network of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.

Organisation

• The financial resources of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND.
• The Patents of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND are not well organised as identified by the TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
• The distribution network of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND. TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND.

From the VRIO Analysis of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of TO GO OR NOT TO GO INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CROWD2FUND is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.