- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis shows that Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. These patents also provide Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis shows that Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. As this resource is valuable, Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are a rare resource as identified by the Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are costly to imitate as identified by the Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO.
- The Patents of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO are not well organised as identified by the Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO. Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO.
From the VRIO Analysis of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Tesla Motors The Evolution of Governance from Inception to IPO is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Thomas Nico
5.0
All the guidelines were strictly followed and very very high-quality paper. Discounts also good enough. Thanks!
Daura Blazas
5.0
Everyone can ask for any type of assignment and this service will help you. Thank you so much!
Tom Mitchel
5.0
The sentence’s flaw and formation were exactly what the teacher instructed and I’m satisfied with this company. Thanks a lot!
Jackson Edward
5.0
I’m totally beholden to you guys for a good job! These guys are awesome in writing a research paper. You guys are the best!
Next Articles
- Seven Myths Of Corporate Governance Vrio Analysis
- Seven Myths Of Executive Compensation Vrio Analysis
- Are Current CEOs The Best Board Members? Vrio Analysis
- Scarlet Letter: Are The CEOs And Directors Of Failed Companies 'Tainted'? Vrio Analysis
- The NCAA Adopts 'Dodd Frank': A Fable Vrio Analysis
- The Dolores Project Vrio Analysis
- Study Questions For The Dolores Project Vrio Analysis
- Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy In 2011: Leading The Way Towards Zero Emission Vrio Analysis
- France Telecom Orange In 2011: Stephane Richard And 'Conquests 2015' Vrio Analysis
- Study Questions For McAfee (A) Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- The Resignation Of David Sokol: Mountain Or Molehill For Berkshire Hathaway? Vrio Analysis
- Do ISS Voting Recommendations Create Shareholder Value? Vrio Analysis
- CEO Health Disclosure At Apple: A Public Or Private Matter? Vrio Analysis
- Pledge (and Hedge) Allegiance To The Company Vrio Analysis
- Sensitivity Of CEO Wealth To Stock Price: A New Tool For Assessing Pay For Performance Vrio Analysis
- Pro Forma Earnings: What's Wrong With GAAP? Vrio Analysis
- Director Networks: Good For The Director, Good For Shareholders Vrio Analysis
- Financial Manipulation: Words Don't Lie Vrio Analysis
- Proxy Access: A Sheep, Or Wolf In Sheep's Clothing? Vrio Analysis
- CEO Succession Planning: Who's Behind Door Number One? Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!