- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help The US-China Wind Power Dispute in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis shows that The US-China Wind Power Dispute's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of The US-China Wind Power Dispute's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for The US-China Wind Power Dispute. These patents also provide The US-China Wind Power Dispute with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis shows that The US-China Wind Power Dispute’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for The US-China Wind Power Dispute. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at The US-China Wind Power Dispute is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for The US-China Wind Power Dispute. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as The US-China Wind Power Dispute and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for The US-China Wind Power Dispute. As this resource is valuable, The US-China Wind Power Dispute can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are a rare resource as identified by the The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows The US-China Wind Power Dispute to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of The US-China Wind Power Dispute is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are costly to imitate as identified by the The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by The US-China Wind Power Dispute provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are also not costly to imitate as identified by the The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from The US-China Wind Power Dispute by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of The US-China Wind Power Dispute a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of The US-China Wind Power Dispute is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by The US-China Wind Power Dispute. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for The US-China Wind Power Dispute.
- The Patents of The US-China Wind Power Dispute are not well organised as identified by the The US-China Wind Power Dispute VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if The US-China Wind Power Dispute starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of The US-China Wind Power Dispute is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute. The US-China Wind Power Dispute uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for The US-China Wind Power Dispute.
From the VRIO Analysis of The US-China Wind Power Dispute, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of The US-China Wind Power Dispute is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Florencia
5.0
The dissertation was, in fact, as I was thought because I knew that this service would never get me in trouble.
Sezilard Furkan
5.0
The expert responded to me very politely. Additionally, the teacher didn’t make any single comment regarding the paper. Lots of thanks!
Sandra Larry
5.0
It's my habit to postpone writing the paper at the last hour with the idea that I can't write it. Whenever I do this, this service provides a good paper to me.
Yasmine Viktor
5.0
I’m wordless for the professionalism of this service. Every point was top-notch. Will not forget what this service did for me. Thank you very much!
Next Articles
- Revenue And Expense Recognition At NetSuite, Inc Vrio Analysis
- Xiaomi, Inc: The Rise Of A Chinese Indigenous Competitor Vrio Analysis
- Micro Entrepreneur Elena Amaru Makes The Leap, Learning Business Fundamentals And Boosting Self Confidence Vrio Analysis
- Thunderbird: Improving The Online Experience: Web Performing Analytics Vrio Analysis
- Volcom: Building An Authentic Brand Vrio Analysis
- Sony Corporation: Is The Sum Greater Than The Parts? Vrio Analysis
- Netshoes.com: A Major League E Tailer In Brazil Vrio Analysis
- Hola Kola: The Capital Budgeting Decision Vrio Analysis
- Brazil Vs The US At The WTO: The US Brazil Cotton Subsidy Dispute Vrio Analysis
- Hidden Protectionism Or Legitimate Concern? The US EU Beef Hormone Dispute Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Pioneer Energy In Turkmenistan (A) And (B) Vrio Analysis
- Chinas National Oil Companies: Restructuring The Three Dragons Vrio Analysis
- Identify The Industry Analysis Of Financial Statement Data Vrio Analysis
- 3P Turbo: Cross Border Investment In Brazil Vrio Analysis
- Meta Abo Brewery: Creating A Sustainable Value Chain In Ethiopia Vrio Analysis
- Thumbnail Image For IMD 7 1923 ZH Promoting Inclusive Finance: Agricultural Bank Of China Vrio Analysis
- Morality Or Protectionism? The US Antigua Internet Gambling Dispute In The WTO Vrio Analysis
- JetBlue & Gladly: Omnichannel Customer Service Vrio Analysis
- Quadrant Homes: Adapting A Lean Operating Model To New Market Realities Vrio Analysis
- Procter & Gamble's Battle With Nelson Peltz Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!