- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis shows that Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. These patents also provide Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis shows that Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. As this resource is valuable, Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are a rare resource as identified by the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are costly to imitate as identified by the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS.
- The Patents of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS are not well organised as identified by the Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS. Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS.
From the VRIO Analysis of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Hostile Takeover Battle in Japan Fuji TV vs Livedoor for NBS is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Nicole Ken
5.0
I was pre-informed about the late delivery of the assignment. The reference section was all right and the other portions of the assignment were also good enough. Thank you!
Luke Blake
5.0
The document that was delivered by this service was free from plagiarism. This service is totally helpful for me and I like it very much! Really, excellent experience!
Marzia Cettina
5.0
I received my coursework from them a few days ago, and I'm satisfied with the assignment's quality.
Lie Weng
4.0
I'm fully delighted with this service because the level of the paper was excellent. I really appreciate them.
Next Articles
- Shanghai General Motors: The Rise Of A Late Comer Vrio Analysis
- Yu Tin Sing's Enterprises: Proactive Risk And Crisis Management Vrio Analysis
- The Transformation Of China's Steel Industry Vrio Analysis
- Go2xpert Limited: Finding The Right China Strategy Vrio Analysis
- Toyland Rubber Manufacturing: Building A New Factory In Shanghai Vrio Analysis
- Dream International Ltd: Creating The World's Largest Manufacturer Of Plush Toys Vrio Analysis
- Proactive Planning Before Crises Happen Vrio Analysis
- The Hong Kong Property Industry In 1999 Vrio Analysis
- China And The Sino US WTO Agreement Vrio Analysis
- The Asean Free Trade Area (AFTA) And The Malaysian National Car Project Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- HP's Computer Business: Can It Compete? Vrio Analysis
- Motorola In China: Failure Of Success? Vrio Analysis
- CK Yeung Worldwide Limited: Management As Art, Science And Philosophy Vrio Analysis
- IBM's 'On Demand Business' Strategy Vrio Analysis
- Fedex Corp: Structural Transformation Through E Business Vrio Analysis
- AccuForm: Ethical Leadership And Its Challenges In The Era Of Globalisation Vrio Analysis
- Livedoor: The Rise And Fall Of A Market Maverick Vrio Analysis
- Penny Wise, Pound Foolish: Hong Kong's Penny Stock Incidentiews On Corporate Social Responsibility Vrio Analysis
- Lafarge's C O Tool: Supporting Co2 Mitigation Decision Making' Vrio Analysis
- Metalclad In Mexico (B) Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!