- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis shows that Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. These patents also provide Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis shows that Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. As this resource is valuable, Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are a rare resource as identified by the Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are costly to imitate as identified by the Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers.
- The Patents of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers are not well organised as identified by the Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers. Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers.
From the VRIO Analysis of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Positive Versus Negative Word-of-Mouth Effects on Receivers is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Jaffery Noah
5.0
My order was delivered promptly without any fault. Thanks a lot!
Jackson Nathaniel
5.0
When I called this company for an urgent order, it was available to provide the best writer for the assignment. I’ll order this service again and again.
Mei-hui
5.0
The expert covered the topic and the writer edited the paper concerning mistakes. Thanks!
Madeline Harley
5.0
Very high quality of the paper and this service is just what I anticipated. The great writer with whom I worked with. I'm thankful for this service!
Next Articles
- Factors Influencing Sales People's Performance: A Study Of Mobile Service Providers In Bangladesh Vrio Analysis
- Enhancing The Export Performance Of The SMEs In The Manufacturing Sector In Zimbabwe Vrio Analysis
- SME's Performance Of Creative Industries Supporting Tourism In Indonesia: Market Orientation, Learning Orientation And Organizational Innovativeness As Determinants Vrio Analysis
- A Comprehensive Structural Equation Modeling For E Impulse Buying Vrio Analysis
- Purchase Intention Survey Of Millennials Towards Online Fashion Stores Vrio Analysis
- The Possibility Of Appling The Balanced Scorecard A Tool Of Evaluating The Strategic Performance Of The Jordanian Private Universities (Field Study From The Perspective Of Workers In Private Universities In Jordan) Vrio Analysis
- The Influence Of Mediating Variables On Market Orientation During Organizational Change Vrio Analysis
- Validation Of Airline Service Quality Scale: Evidence From Indian And European Passengers Vrio Analysis
- Existence Of Consumer Segments Based On The Use Of Reference Price Vrio Analysis
- Impact Of Celebrity Endorsements And The Prevalence Of Vampire Effect A Review Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Retail Service Quality In Indonesia: Traditional Market Vs Modern Market Vrio Analysis
- Implicit Effects Of Online Advertising On Consumer Cognitive Processes Vrio Analysis
- Business To Business Framework Of Relationship Marketing In The South African Cement Manufacturing Industry Vrio Analysis
- The Influence Of Celebrity Endorsement On Visual Attention: An Eye Tracking Study In Brazil Vrio Analysis
- Effects Of Country Of Origin And Product Features On Customer Purchase Intention: A Study Of Imported Powder Milk Vrio Analysis
- Brand Loyalty On The Basis Of Olfactory Techniques Using Discriminant Analysis: A Case Of Cafe Coffee Day Store In Kolkata, India Vrio Analysis
- Post Switching Behaviour: Bottom Of The Pyramid (BOP) Stockpiling As A Result Of Sales Promotion Vrio Analysis
- An Analysis Of The Origins Of Collaborative Consumption And Its Implications For Marketing Vrio Analysis
- Zero Tolerance Or Zero Rationality Vrio Analysis
- LKT Products; A Failed Lean Journey Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!