- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis shows that New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. These patents also provide New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis shows that New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. As this resource is valuable, New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are a rare resource as identified by the New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are costly to imitate as identified by the New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are also not costly to imitate as identified by the New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America.
- The Patents of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America are not well organised as identified by the New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America. New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America.
From the VRIO Analysis of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of New York Department of Revenue vs Quality Markets of America is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Elias Cristian
5.0
I asked for the specified writer and this service provided me with the preferred expert and I got a comprehensive dissertation.
Mauricio Aguayo
5.0
It's difficult to imagine what I would have done without the help of the writer but grateful to God, who let me be in the view of this service. Thanks!
Hamish Ali
5.0
All my requirements were resolved so I want to state: “I’m very happy with this service”. Thanks!
Grace Chao
5.0
Thinking about the vast research for the report writing was killing me. On the recommendation of a friend, I hired this service and downloaded a good assignment. Thank you!
Next Articles
- Pandora Investments Wurundi, Inc Vrio Analysis
- Hedging With Foreign Currency Futures At Transcend Inc Vrio Analysis
- Demand Media, Inc Vrio Analysis
- An Accounting Change At American Rock Salt Company Vrio Analysis
- Design Prototypes Inc Project Management (A): Selection Of The Project Team Vrio Analysis
- Speedy DSL Corporation Vrio Analysis
- New Product Innovation At Chet's Fan Manufacturing, Inc (CFM) Vrio Analysis
- Cirque Du Soleil: An Innovative Culture Of Entertainment Vrio Analysis
- Family Feud At John Blaine Trucking Company, Inc Vrio Analysis
- Tiny's Tiny Pies: Pie In The Sky Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Vonage: An Opportunity In The Telecommunication Industry Vrio Analysis
- Entrepreneurs And The Federal Deficit Gap (Making The Case For Expenditure Cuts And/or Tax Increases) Vrio Analysis
- Paymore Or Paylater: Inventory Valuation And Materiality Vrio Analysis
- Dog Eat Dog World: Challenges Of An Entrepreneurial Start Up Vrio Analysis
- An Element Of Concern In North Africa: The Case Of Morocco's Phosphate Industry Vrio Analysis
- Altos De Tinogasta, Argentina Vrio Analysis
- Pricing REI Memberships: The Use Of Segmentation And Value Estimation Pricing Vrio Analysis
- Creativity, Innovation And Entrepreneurship: The Case Of H Wayne Huizenga Vrio Analysis
- Carson's Department Store: When To Stay And When To Go Vrio Analysis
- Is No Upgrade A Downgrade? Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!