- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis shows that The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. These patents also provide The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis shows that The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. As this resource is valuable, The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are a rare resource as identified by the The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are costly to imitate as identified by the The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are also not costly to imitate as identified by the The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests.
- The Patents of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests are not well organised as identified by the The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests. The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests.
From the VRIO Analysis of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of The Keynesian-monetarist Controversy in International Economics Discriminatory Power of Long-run Empirical Tests is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Dan Zack
5.0
Just excellent paper! Finding this service is the best thing of my life. Extremely helpful people!
Song Cao
5.0
The assignment was referenced accordingly in the way that I asked. I'm happy with this customer service.
Arnaud Oliver
5.0
I used to get poor grades because of writing style. When I realized that my writing style wouldn't improve, I hired this company and scored my CGPA. Thanks a lot!
Raphael Marco
4.0
This custom paper writing is super helpful and provided the paper to me within six hours. Great experience!
Next Articles
- The Conservation Of Extencia: A New Law Of Conservation Vrio Analysis
- Mid 18th Century Economic Changes: The Rise Of Adam Smith And The Decline Of The Mercantilists And Physiocrats Vrio Analysis
- Possibility Of Russia Becoming A Strong Economic Power House Vrio Analysis
- Using Auto Racing As A Model To Teach Economics For Grades K 12 Vrio Analysis
- Factors Affecting Economic Literacy Of College Students: Some Additional Evidence Vrio Analysis
- Peakonomics: Toward A Case Typology For Increasing Undergraduate Economic Literacy And Concept Retention Vrio Analysis
- Using Movies As A Vehicle For Critical Thinking In Economics And Business Vrio Analysis
- Dynamics Of National Debt Accumulation And Economic Performance Vrio Analysis
- An Economic Model For Distributing Body Organs Vrio Analysis
- Macrovariables In Determining The Exchange Of The US Dollar And Major Currencies Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Effect Of Prerequisite On Introductory Statistics Performance Vrio Analysis
- Determinants Of Alumni Giving Rates Vrio Analysis
- Factors Impacting Price For Retail Space In Houston Vrio Analysis
- Capitalism For The Cooperative: The Ncaa And NFL Model Of Parity And Profit Vrio Analysis
- Risk Taking In Nascar: An Examination Of Compensating Behavior And Tournament Theory In Racing Vrio Analysis
- The Economic Effects Of Harrah's Cherokee Casino And Hotel On The Regional Economy Of Western North Carolina Vrio Analysis
- The US Current Account: The Impact Of Household Wealth Vrio Analysis
- Grade Expectations Vrio Analysis
- Growth Determinants For Colombia: National And Regional Panel Data Evidence 1964 2002 Vrio Analysis
- Deriving Demand Curves For Specific Types Of Outdoor Recreation Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!