- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis shows that Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. These patents also provide Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis shows that Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. As this resource is valuable, Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are a rare resource as identified by the Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are costly to imitate as identified by the Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses.
- The Patents of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses are not well organised as identified by the Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses. Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses.
From the VRIO Analysis of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Diversification Strategy in Electric Utilities Who Wins Who Loses is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Hina Singh
5.0
The slides would be depicted if you include more slides but I’m responsible because I ordered only 21 slides and the topic required a lot more than this. Excellent job!
Guiren Yi
5.0
Writer # 561287 was great and I'll definitely request for this writer again. I'm satisfied with every feature of this service. Highly recommended!
Pouline Hugo
5.0
The writer followed all my instructions and I’m very happy with the paper quality that I received from here. Thanks a lot!
Wava
5.0
Professional, Accurate, Excellent work. Also, in a very short time. I will definitely refer all my friends. Than you.
Next Articles
- Corporate Governance Characteristics Of Growth Companies: An Empirical Study Vrio Analysis
- Searching For Strategic Opportunities Vrio Analysis
- Leadership Across Cultures: A Comparative Study Vrio Analysis
- Toward A Management Strategy For Optimal Recruiting: Potential Applicant Concerns On Goodness Of Fit In The Corporate Culture Vrio Analysis
- Strategic Orientation, Organizational Structure, And The Associated Effects On Performance In Industrial Firms Vrio Analysis
- Failing To Learn From Failure: An Exploratory Study Of Corporate Entrepreneurship Outcomes Vrio Analysis
- Assessing Managerial Decisions Using The Dual Systems Theory Of Reasoning: Future Challenges For Management Researchers Vrio Analysis
- Edwards Deming, Mary P Follett And Frederick W Taylor: Reconciliation Of Differences In Organizational And Strategic Leadership Vrio Analysis
- Leading A Postmodern Workforce Vrio Analysis
- The Strategic Implications Of Technology On Job Loss Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Market Perception Of Synergies In Related Acquisitions Vrio Analysis
- The Relationship Between Market Orientation And Performance Under Different Environmental Conditions: The Moderating Effect Of The Top Management Team's Risk Taking Behavior Vrio Analysis
- Business Strategy Perspectives And Economic Theory: A Proposed Integration Vrio Analysis
- NBA Player: Money Tree Or Money Pit Vrio Analysis
- The Du Pont Model: Evaluating Alternative Strategies In The Retail Industry Vrio Analysis
- The Power Of Intrafirm Networks Vrio Analysis
- Impact Of Customers' Personality Traits In Retail Environments Vrio Analysis
- Crisis Response Plans Post 9/11: Current Status And Future Directions Vrio Analysis
- Output Decisions Of Firms Under Uncertainty: Some Micro Theoretic Analysis Vrio Analysis
- The Reverse Takeover: Implications For Strategy Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!