VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students

Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018

The VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.

Valuable

• The Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students in combating external threats.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
• The Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis shows that Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students's products.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. These patents also provide Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
• The Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis shows that Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
• According to the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
• The Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.

Rare

• The financial resources of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
• The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. As this resource is valuable, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can still make use of this resource.
• The employees of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
• The patents of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are a rare resource as identified by the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to use them without interference from the competition.
• The distribution network of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.

Imitable

• The financial resources of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are costly to imitate as identified by the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
• The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
• The employees of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
• The patents of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
• The distribution network of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.

Organisation

• The financial resources of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students.
• The Patents of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are not well organised as identified by the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
• The distribution network of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students.

From the VRIO Analysis of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.