- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis shows that To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. These patents also provide To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis shows that To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. As this resource is valuable, To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are a rare resource as identified by the To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are costly to imitate as identified by the To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are also not costly to imitate as identified by the To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma.
- The Patents of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma are not well organised as identified by the To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma. To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma.
From the VRIO Analysis of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of To Loan or Not to Loan A Subprime Dilemma is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Zhang Yong
4.0
Writer was very helpful for all the specifications of mine. Nothing was plagiarized in the assignment. Thank you so much!
Emma Balazs
4.0
This service is sincere with its job as I called it for the revision and it accepted the demand. The final paper was okay and I’m satisfied.
Jeng Meilin
4.0
Good & trustworthy source of completing the students’ assignments and I’m satisfied with what I got from here. Thanks!
Lenzo Alan
5.0
Great writing and great skills in writing a perfect paper. The assignment was free from grammatical, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Overall an excellent assignment. Much thanks!
Next Articles
- Second Draft Of A Business Plan: What Should It Contain? Vrio Analysis
- Parout's 'Bone Marrow Drive' Project Management Vrio Analysis
- Renault Yahoo! Argentina Vrio Analysis
- Missouri Solvents: Managing Cash Flow Vrio Analysis
- Diversity Management: Facilitating Diversity Through The Recruitment, Selection And Integration Of Diverse Employees In A Quebec Bank Vrio Analysis
- Wal Mart: Getting Back To Growth Old Guard Vs Change Agent Conflict And The Impact On Growth Vrio Analysis
- Wal Mart Is Coming To India Vrio Analysis
- Financial Analysis Of Wrongful Termination: Joseph Kidwell Vrio Analysis
- Resmed: Waking Up To Sleep Vrio Analysis
- Sierra Pacific Resources Implements A Merger Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- The Development Of A Fleet Vehicle Replacement Policy For A Federal Government Contractor Vrio Analysis
- Lauren's Wardrobe Vrio Analysis
- AmeriTech In The Philippines: Failure To Adjust To Filipino Cultural Norms? Vrio Analysis
- Optimizing The Advertising Budget For A Regional Business: The Case Of Cycle World Vrio Analysis
- Timko Export Management Company: The Dynamics Of International Entrepreneurship Vrio Analysis
- Mohawk Industries, Inc (MHK): Assessing Financial Performance During A Period Of Rapid Expansion Vrio Analysis
- Adjusting International Agreements In Light Of Change: A Case Of Assisted Renegoitation Vrio Analysis
- Alabama Power Response To Katrina: Managing A Severe Service Supply Chain Disruption Vrio Analysis
- Bezanilla & Bezanilla Real Estate Development Company Vrio Analysis
- Cape Chemical: Captial Budgeting Issues Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!