- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis shows that Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. These patents also provide Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis shows that Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. As this resource is valuable, Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are a rare resource as identified by the Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are costly to imitate as identified by the Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong.
- The Patents of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong are not well organised as identified by the Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong. Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong.
From the VRIO Analysis of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Dunkin Donuts in India What Went Wrong is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Dalton Devon
4.0
You people are the partner of my study!
Hany Abrahim
5.0
I'm a newcomer in college and managing the assignments is difficult at this time. I hired this service last week and got the solution of variance. I am satisfied with this service and hope it will frame all the papers as it did now.
Jiao Wang
5.0
One of the quick services whose timely turnaround saved me from facing a disastrous situation. Paper was explained and written properly.
Dong Qian
5.0
This writing service made me get admission to my dreamed university. Thank you write # 276368 for assisting me a lot during my exams.
Next Articles
- Uber: Dreaming High With Flying Cars? Vrio Analysis
- Bulb The Start Up Disrupting UK's Energy Sector Vrio Analysis
- Sustainable Packaging Initiatives: A Reality Check Vrio Analysis
- Brooks Brothers: Being Relevant Beyond 200 Vrio Analysis
- Baidu's Artificial Intelligence Drive: Can COO Exit Impede The Momentum? Vrio Analysis
- Iconic Jawa Crafts A New Brand Story Vrio Analysis
- Mattel's Turnaround Strategies Under CEO Ynon Kreiz Vrio Analysis
- BigBasket Vs Grofers: Who Will Win The Online Grocery War? Vrio Analysis
- Online Food Delivery In India: On A Growth Spree Vrio Analysis
- Tencent Holdings: Restructuring To Meet Regulatory Challenges Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Workplace Friendship: An Organisational Asset? Vrio Analysis
- Honest Tea: An Entrepreneurial Success Vrio Analysis
- Chobani: Winning The US Yogurt War Vrio Analysis
- Gillette's 'We Believe' Campaign: Caught Up In Controversy Vrio Analysis
- Four Day Work Week: A Worthy Option? Vrio Analysis
- SB Energy Essel Group JV: Driving India's Renewable Energy Dream? Vrio Analysis
- Chanel Bans Exotic Skins And Fur: A Socially Responsible Move? Vrio Analysis
- Transfix: 'Uber' Of The Trucking Industry Vrio Analysis
- Google Pointy Collaboration: A Move To Offset Amazon? Vrio Analysis
- Chai Sahay: A Boon For Small Tea Growers? Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!