- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of To Donate or Not are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help To Donate or Not in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis shows that To Donate or Not's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of To Donate or Not's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for To Donate or Not. These patents also provide To Donate or Not with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis shows that To Donate or Not’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for To Donate or Not. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at To Donate or Not is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for To Donate or Not. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of To Donate or Not are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as To Donate or Not and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for To Donate or Not. As this resource is valuable, To Donate or Not can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of To Donate or Not are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of To Donate or Not are a rare resource as identified by the To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows To Donate or Not to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of To Donate or Not is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of To Donate or Not. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of To Donate or Not are costly to imitate as identified by the To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by To Donate or Not provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of To Donate or Not are also not costly to imitate as identified by the To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from To Donate or Not by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of To Donate or Not a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of To Donate or Not are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of To Donate or Not is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by To Donate or Not. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of To Donate or Not are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for To Donate or Not.
- The Patents of To Donate or Not are not well organised as identified by the To Donate or Not VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if To Donate or Not starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of To Donate or Not is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not. To Donate or Not uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for To Donate or Not.
From the VRIO Analysis of To Donate or Not, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of To Donate or Not is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
David Patrick
5.0
The assignment was going to be on the deadline and I was in the middle of nowhere. At last, I clicked the button of order but perplexed about the delivery on schedule. I received the work within five and a half hours. I just kept an eye view of it and got relaxed because it was good.
Chavi Monga
5.0
When the project turned up it was near to the professor’s guidelines. Recommended this service for term papers.
Valeria Einstein
5.0
Clear formatting, consistent writing and outstanding vocabulary. I like this service very much. Thanks for this help!
Khalil R Al-Battat
4.0
Good
Next Articles
- Bush At The Crossroads At The End Of The Cold War Vrio Analysis
- High Performance Teams In La Sin Igual Bottling Plant, SA Vrio Analysis
- Samsung Mobile Display (C): Branding And Communication Strategy Vrio Analysis
- Cyprus: A Divided Island Vrio Analysis
- The Phone Call Vrio Analysis
- Cielo Azul: Building The Second Phrase? Vrio Analysis
- Imbalance In The Working Group Vrio Analysis
- ABC: A World Class Local Enterprise? Vrio Analysis
- Work And Family: Grisel's Dilemma Vrio Analysis
- All In A Day's Work Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- Productivity In The Shampoo Production Line Vrio Analysis
- Château Fonchereau Vrio Analysis
- Jaloma Vrio Analysis
- Eurocasa: A Retail Sale's Dream Vrio Analysis
- What Is The Economic Value Of Nature's Cosmetics? Vrio Analysis
- Solidarity Based Economic Business Model: The Case Of The Coopaguaduales Cooperative Vrio Analysis
- Agrícola El Bosque, S L: The Reinvention Of A Family Business Vrio Analysis
- Pampini Family Vrio Analysis
- Songs And Genocide: The Bikindi Case Vrio Analysis
- Three Companies, One Society Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!