- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division
Posted by Zachary Edwards on Mar-22-2018
The VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division will look at each of its internal resources one by one to assess whether these provide sustained competitive advantage. The Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis also mentions at each stage whether these resources could be improved to provide a greater competitive advantage. Lastly, the resources analysed are summarised as to whether they offer sustained competitive advantage, has an unused competitive advantage, temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity or competitive disadvantage.
Valuable
- The Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis shows that the financial resources of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are highly valuable as these help in investing into external opportunities that arise. These also help Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division in combating external threats.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division, its local food products are a valuable resource as these are highly differentiated. This makes the perceived value for these by customers high. These are also valued more than the competition by customers due to the differentiation in these products.
- The Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis shows that Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division's employees are a valuable resource to the firm. A significant portion of the workforce is highly trained, and this leads to more productive output for the organisation. The employees are also loyal, and retention levels for the organisation are high. All of this translates into greater value for the end consumers of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division's products.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division, its patents are a valuable resource as these allow the firm to sell its products without competitive interference. This results in greater revenue for Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. These patents also provide Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division with licensing revenue when it licenses these patents out to other manufacturers.
- The Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis shows that Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division’s distribution network is a valuable resource. This helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater revenues for Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the products are easily available.
- According to the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division, its cost structure is not a valuable resource. This is because the methods of production lead to greater costs than that of competition, which affects the overall profits of the firm. Therefore, its cost structure is a competitive disadvantage that needs to be worked on.
- The Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis shows that the research and development at Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division is not a valuable resource. This is because research and development are costing more than the benefits it provides in the form of innovation. There have been very few innovative features and breakthrough products in the past few years. Therefore, research and development are a competitive disadvantage for Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. It is recommended that the research and development teams are improved, and costs are cut for these.
Rare
- The financial resources of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are found to be rare according to the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. Strong financial resources are only possessed by a few companies in the industry.
- The local food products are found to be not rare as identified by Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis. These are easily provided in the market by other competitors. This means that competitors can use these resources in the same way as Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division and inhibit competitive advantage. This means that the local food products result in competitive parity for Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. As this resource is valuable, Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division can still make use of this resource.
- The employees of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. These employees are highly trained and skilled, which is not the case with employees in other firms. The better compensation and work environment ensure that these employees do not leave for other firms.
- The patents of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are a rare resource as identified by the Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis. These patents are not easily available and are not possessed by competitors. This allows Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division to use them without interference from the competition.
- The distribution network of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division is a rare resource as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. This is because competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution network than that of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. These are also possessed by very few firms in the industry.
Imitable
- The financial resources of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are costly to imitate as identified by the Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis. These resources have been acquired by the company through prolonged profits over the years. New entrants and competitors would require similar profits for a long period of time to accumulate these amounts of financial resources.
- The local food products are not that costly to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. These can be acquired by competitors as well if they invest a significant amount in research and development. These also do not require years long experience. Therefore, the local food products by Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division provide it with a temporary competitive advantage that competitors can too acquire in the long run.
- The employees of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are also not costly to imitate as identified by the Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis. This is because other firms can also train their employees to improve their skills. These companies can also hire employees from Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division by offering better compensation packages, work environment, benefits, growth opportunities etc. This makes the employees of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division a resource that provides a temporary competitive advantage. Competition can acquire these in the future.
- The patents of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are very difficult to imitate as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. This is because it is not legally allowed to imitate a patented product. Similar resources to be developed and getting a patent for them is also a costly process.
- The distribution network of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division is also very costly to imitate by competition as identified by the Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis. This has been developed over the years gradually by Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. Competitors would have to invest a significant amount if they are to imitate a similar distribution system.
Organisation
- The financial resources of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are organised to capture value as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. These resources are used strategically to invest in the right places; making use of opportunities and combatting threats. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division.
- The Patents of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division are not well organised as identified by the Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division VRIO Analysis. This means that the organisation is not using these patents to their full potential. An unused competitive advantage exists that can be changed into a sustainable competitive advantage if Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division starts selling patented products before the patents expire.
- The distribution network of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division is organised as identified by the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division. Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division uses this network to reach out to its customers by ensuring that products are available on all of its outlets. Therefore, these resources prove to be a source of sustained competitive advantage for Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division.
From the VRIO Analysis of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division, it was identified that the financial resources and distribution network provide a sustained competitive advantage. The patents are a source of unused competitive advantage. There exists a temporary competitive advantage for employees. There exists a competitive parity for local food products. Lastly, the cost structure of Bob Holgrom and the Buyout of the Carlson Division is a competitive disadvantage. Research and Development is also a competitive disadvantage.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Yu Bai
5.0
I desire to refer this service to all of those students who are in a situation as I was. Good prices and no plagiarism. Great job!
Aliz Tibor
5.0
Sustained and hassle-free communication with the expert. I’m glad guys!
Ryan Steven
5.0
They are honest and easy to work with. I got the answer to every question very straightforward and would like to place one more order.
Hanna Jesse
4.0
The order was very well done and I received an A+ from this assignment writing help. Thank you!
Next Articles
- SK Planet In 2013: A Korean Giant's Big Bet On The U.S. Market Vrio Analysis
- Kyocera Corp. Vrio Analysis
- First Solar, Inc. In 2013 Vrio Analysis
- Serendipity Software Vrio Analysis
- Cerner Corp. (A) Vrio Analysis
- Microsoft: Competing On Talent (A), Spanish Version Vrio Analysis
- Kenan Systems Vrio Analysis
- Time Warner, Inc. And The ORC Patents Vrio Analysis
- Intel NBI: Intel Corporation's New Business Initiatives (A) Vrio Analysis
- Bill Gates And The Management Of Microsoft Vrio Analysis
Previous Articles
- General Micro Electronics, Incorporated: Semiconductor Assembly Process Vrio Analysis
- AMD Dresden: Copy Inexactly! Vrio Analysis
- Foxconn Technology Group (A) Vrio Analysis
- InterSoft Of Argentina (A) Vrio Analysis
- Horizontal Specialization And Modularity In The Semiconductor Industry Vrio Analysis
- Siebel Systems: Culture As A Pillar Of Success Vrio Analysis
- RetailSoft: Role For Regan Kessel Vrio Analysis
- Differences At Work: Jason (A) Vrio Analysis
- Cimetrics Technology (A1) Vrio Analysis
- The InnoCar Project Developing A Chip For The Future Automobile (D): Episode 3 Vrio Analysis
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!